Tim Keller on movements

Aug 03 | Heather | 1 Comment |

I thought Tim Keller’s perspective here on the difference between movements and institutions was insightful.

“A movement is marked by an attractive, clear, unifying vision for the future together with a strong set of values or beliefs. The content of the vision must be compelling and clear so that others can grasp it readily. It must not be so esoteric or difficult that only a handful of people can articulate it. Instead, it must be something that all members of the movement can understand and pass along to others. By contrast, “institutionalized” organizations are held together by rules, regulations, and procedures, not by a shared vision.”

Read the full post here. As usual, Keller proposes a helpful “third way” between the two.

One Response to “Tim Keller on movements”

1. Chris Garrett says:

   August 4, 2010 at 9:31 pm

   Great summary of movements vs. institutions. I’ve been involved with student campus movements and mission movements over the years, and I agree that the vision must be compelling and easy to grasp by others. The clearer and sharper the vision, the easier it is for others to join the cause. This shared vision can and does transcend cultures, and thus we have Christian movements touching all countries of the globe. Thanks be to God for the Holy Spirit who guides and shepherds these movements. What greater testimony can there be of God’s power and reality than the common bond that all Christians share around the world!